[ad_1]
Anna Holmes has an appealing piece at The New Yorker: “Jezebel and the Issue of Women’s Anger.” Holmes was the founding editor of Jezebel in its heyday, and she explores how the web site was groundbreaking in its articulations of the items girls are not meant to examine and the approaches in which they are not meant to go over them. I am briefly talked about in the essay, as an individual who complained Jezebel’s writers were carrying out small much more than “‘caterwauling about the patriarchy.’” In any case, the story is a superior read and a considerate thought of regardless of whether or not the feminist blogosphere laid the groundwork for today’s on the net fracturosphere. I do want, however, that she had talked a lot more about the recent state of Jezebel and what she thinks of it now. Was Jezebel subsumed … or a feminist-rage device not built to last?
Buy My Book | About | Employ the service of Me | Site | Forbes | Twitter | Instagram | LinkedIn | E mail
[ad_2]
Resource hyperlink
